With two schools announcing closure for a week, the entire 1st year cohort of Republic Polytechnic also staying home, and who knows what the NS guys at Maju camp are doing (I seriously doubt its home quarantine). We need to look at this stage of our fight against H1N1.
Already the disconnect between people who are panicking about H1N1, and people who are blase about it is showing. Someone complained on the Straits Times Forums today that her dad, who went to Maju Camp for IPPT test, and had flu-like symptoms spent $85 going to Tan Tock Seng Hospital and did not get a H1N1 test. Something is seriously wrong with the implementation of the policies.
How about the policies of shutting schools? For the abovementioned schools that are shut for a week, what happens when you have yet another case after this week? Are they going to shut for the whole influenza season? Are parents bringing the virus back home from their workplace? Several companies may already be affected, are we prepared to shut down whole businesses for weeks on end?
The question is this, are our actions to mitigate the effect of H1N1 causing more disruption to our way of life than if we let the illness run its course? Keeping in mind that once a person contracts H1N1, she would be immuned for life and the fact that 1 million Americans have contracted the virus but only 65 has died. Of course, like all medical statistics, it does not matter if the success rate is 99%, if I am to be the 1%. Considering the U.S. relative size and comparatively worse health care system, we stand in better stead to help those who contract the virus recover.
Of course, I would not suggest H1N1 parties, but perhaps keeping our heads level and treating this virus like it is: a treatable influenza virus that kills not any more than your seasonal flu. Let it run its course, let the ill take medical leave and get treatment and not panic about it. Of course, this is not considering the spectre of the virus mutating. Either way, we are wholly unprepared for the virus turning into a deadly strain. How many of us have 3 months worth of food and water stockpiled so we can stay home and avoid all contact for an entire influenza season?
Compared to the deadly H5N1 days, due to the non-deadly nature of the current virus, we are also not having as severe a witch hunt against the people whose irresponsible behaviour has caused infections.
Unfortunately, the reputation of being a virus infected country treats every country differently. While America has the most cases of H1N1 at 1 million, people are more likely to avoid Mexico than the U.S. Largely as an economic necessity. So why is this economic necessity applied to our own society? We are still sending people to Melbourne, the source to many of our H1N1 cases. There is no right way to handle this situation, but besides the saving of lives, maintaining our normal way of life is one of the main reasons why we want to contain viruses in the first place, so if the containment/mitigation effort is causing the disruptions, should it be reviewed? Or have we gone in too deep to backpedal without risking the reputation of the WHO and our MoH?


Recent Comments